<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title>Jimmy Quinn Author Rss</title>
        <atom:link href="https://dangkygmail.com/author/jimmy-quinn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://dangkygmail.com/author/jimmy-quinn/</link>
        <description>Jimmy Quinn Author Rss - Blog DangKyGmail</description>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:41:00 +0000 </lastBuildDate>
        <language>en-US</language>
        <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
        <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
        <generator>https://dangkygmail.com</generator>
        
                                    <item>
                    <title><![CDATA[An Afghan ISIS affiliate could attempt international attacks within six months, according to a Pentagon official]]></title>
                    <link>https://dangkygmail.com/2021/10/28/an-afghan-isis-affiliate-could-attempt-international-attacks-within-six-months-according-to-a-pentagon-official/</link>
                    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
                                        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimmy Quinn ]]></dc:creator>
                                        <category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
                                                                        <category><![CDATA[ISIS ]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[ United Nations]]></category>
                                                    <category><![CDATA[ Islamic State]]></category>
                                                                <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dangkygmail.com/2021/10/28/an-afghan-isis-affiliate-could-attempt-international-attacks-within-six-months-according-to-a-pentagon-official/</guid>
                    <media:content url="/uploads/2021/10/28/an-afghan-isis-affiliate-could-attempt-international-attacks-within-six-months-according-to-a-pentagon-official.jpg" medium="image">
                        <media:title type="html"><![CDATA[An Afghan ISIS affiliate could attempt international attacks within six months, according to a Pentagon official]]></media:title>
                    </media:content>
                    <enclosure url="/uploads/2021/10/28/an-afghan-isis-affiliate-could-attempt-international-attacks-within-six-months-according-to-a-pentagon-official.jpg" type="image/jpeg"  length="4096" />
                                            <description><![CDATA[According to United Nations estimates, there are roughly 2,000 Islamic State fighters operating in Afghanistan and an estimated 70,000 Taliban forces.]]></description>
                                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Colin Kahl, the Defense Department's undersecretary for policy, Afghanistan's ISIS affiliate could have the potential to launch terrorist strikes on Western and partner targets within six months, according to a Senate committee hearing yesterday. Al-Qaeda would take "a year or two" to be able to do it again, according to Kahl, and the US believes the groups "have the intention" to carry out worldwide strikes. The <em><a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/terror-groups-in-afghanistan-could-be-ready-to-attack-west-in-6-months-u-s-says-11635284966" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Wall Street Journal</a></em> reported on Kahl&rsquo;s remarks:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF10604" target="_blank" rel="noopener">According to United Nations estimates</a>, there are roughly 2,000 Islamic State fighters operating in Afghanistan and an estimated 70,000 Taliban forces.</p>
<p>Mr. Kahl said the U.S. couldn&rsquo;t assess whether the Taliban, which reclaimed control of the country on Aug. 15, could counter the threat from Islamic State.</p>
<p>&ldquo;It is our assessment that the Taliban and ISIS-K are mortal enemies. So the Taliban is highly motivated to go after ISIS-K. Their ability to do so, I think, is to be determined,&rdquo; Mr. Kahl said.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Taliban certainly have a lot of faith in their own capabilities, though. A spokesperson for the group <a href="https://apnews.com/article/business-taliban-islamabad-middle-east-islamic-state-group-4d419bb70259f93f7165169889d05ff1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> the Associated Press this month that &ldquo;we are able to tackle [ISIS] independently.&rdquo; Separately, Taliban officials have <a href="https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/taliban-say-no-al-qaeda-or-isis-afghanistan-2021-09-21/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">claimed</a> that there are no militants from either group in Afghanistan.</p>
<p>One expert, Thomas Joscelyn of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told the <em>Journal </em>that Kahl&rsquo;s testimony shows just how unreliable previous U.S. assessments have been:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&ldquo;If the U.S. limited ISIS and AQ&rsquo;s ability to reconstitute itself, why are they able to come back so quickly?&rdquo; asked Thomas Joscelyn, a senior fellow at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies who has tracked the Taliban and other militant groups in Afghanistan. &ldquo;Such estimates are really just guesswork. Both al Qaeda and ISIS maintain cohesive global networks, and it&rsquo;s really just a question of when they will attempt a big attack on the West.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Throughout the withdrawal process, the Biden administration pointed to so-called <a href="https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/08/the-cost-to-our-security/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&ldquo;over-the horizon&rdquo; capabilities</a> with which U.S. forces would strike terrorist targets in Afghanistan. In a speech on August 31, President Biden touted that approach, &ldquo;which means we can strike terrorists and targets without American boots on the ground&mdash;or very few, if needed.&rdquo;</p>
<p>If it&rsquo;s accurate, this latest assessment will put that approach to the test.</p>]]></content:encoded>
                </item>
                        </channel>
</rss>
